The 2018 National Defense Strategy (which guides the military’s defense priorities) calls for the Department of Defense (DOD) to urgently develop a lethal, resilient, and rapidly adapting joint force in order to address growing threats to U.S. security. But how does an agency as large as DOD figure out what it needs in order to adapt to growing threats?
Today’s WatchBlog looks at how DOD provides senior leaders with the information they need to make tough decisions about the size and capabilities of the military.
Aligning needs with strategy
Similar to any agency, DOD has to balance competing priorities when building its budget request. Decisions about whether to buy more ships for the Navy or combat vehicles for the Army, for example, can have a big effect on the military services’ ability to carry out their missions.
To help senior leaders make informed choices, DOD designed an analytic process—called Support for Strategic Analysis (SSA)—that was intended to help DOD evaluate its force structure needs (such as personnel and equipment) and develop its budgets to meet the priorities of the National Defense Strategy.
However, we found that SSA has been unable to provide senior leaders with the timely and comprehensive analyses they need to adjust the military’s size and capabilities to meet defense priorities. We found 3 main challenges:
- It was difficult to develop a common “starting point” for force structure analysis;
- The military services’ analyses largely supported the status quo; and,
- The process did not provide a way to compare options and identify tradeoffs across DOD.
A stark warning
Having a functioning process to determine military needs is critical for national security. The National Defense Strategy issued a stark warning: failure to adapt will rapidly result in a force that is irrelevant to the threats it will face.
DOD has struggled in the past to improve this process, but has recently reinvigorated its efforts. We made three recommendations to help address the challenges we identified as DOD works to improve its analytic support to senior leaders.
Read our report to learn more.
- Questions on the content of this post? Contact John Pendleton at email@example.com.
- Comments on GAO’s WatchBlog? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org.